Every AI tool will happily generate a commit message for you. It is fast. It is lazy. It is usually okay. And your git history becomes a list of five hundred messages that all say feat: add functionality.
We tried the AI-generated approach for three months. The result: our git log became unreadable. Nobody could tell what changed and why, because every message was generic.
We switched. Now every commit message answers three questions: what changed, why it changed, and what the reviewer should look at. The AI helps by suggesting the phrasing, but the why is always ours.
CodeProof-AI fits in here. It checks whether the work behind the commit actually does what the message claims. So the message cannot lie, even if someone meant well.